A big thank-you goes to Hutchison Austria for doing what HTC could not: they provided us with a loaner of their version HTC Touch 3G at their own expense!
HTC’s Touch 3G has a QVGA screen. This means that we are looking at a resolution of 240×320 – which might not be high, but tends to be universally supported. But how does the screen fare in a real-world test?

Our first competitor takes the shape of Palm’s evergreen Treo 680. It’s a lovely box and had a gorgeous screen two years ago – the Touch 3G dispatches it with ease:
touch 3g screen 0a HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 0b HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 0c HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 0d HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 0e HTC Touch 3G review – screen

HP’s ipaq rx4240 has one of the best LCDs ever – it tends to beat the 3G by a razor-thin margin:
touch 3g screen 1a HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 1b HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 1c HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 1d HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 1e HTC Touch 3G review – screen

Finally, a series of shots next to Nokia’s N96:
touch 3g screen 2a HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 2b HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 2c HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 2d HTC Touch 3G review – screen touch 3g screen 2e HTC Touch 3G review – screen

In the end, I personally think that screen chromatographies must be taken with a large grain of salt nowadays. The Treo 680, which is the weakest device of the batch, has a screen which is more than good enough for everyday use. The Touch 3G is better – so there really should be no issues whatsoever except for low resolution…


Related posts:

  1. HP iPaq Data Messenger review – screen
  2. XPERIA X1 review – screen
  3. HP ipaq 910 business manager review – screen
  4. Samsung i780 review – screen
  5. XPERIA X1 review – size